The academic simulation engine that finds every path forward.

PlanMyClasses transforms institutional policies and student preferences into computable models, then searches a massive possibility space to find valid pathways. Students simulate scenarios—switched majors, failed courses, FAFSA credit floors, offering gaps—and get verified answers in seconds. Embed it in your platform as a licensed API.

US Patent Application Filed 2026
Scroll

The gap

Every planning tool claims to give students an optimized plan. Optimized for whom, exactly?

The average student doesn't exist. A plan that loads chemistry and biology in the same term isn't optimized for the student working nights who knows they can't handle two intense lab courses at once. A plan recommending a full course load this fall isn't optimized for the student who can only take two classes this semester. Those constraints are real—they just weren't captured.

When that student tries to act on the “optimized” recommendation, the tool becomes a validator. They drag a course, get a red X or green check, try another slot, try again. The student is still the brain. The tool is a spell-checker being marketed as an optimizer—because it generated a template at the start, which is no different from an advisor handing over a PDF of a recommended path.

What students actually need is a system that lets them say: “here is my life and my constraints—now find a path designed for me.” That is the tool we built.

PlanMyClasses is not competing with SIS planners or student-success platforms. It is the intelligent feasibility engine that sits on top of those systems. The old model puts the plan at the center and checks every student edit against it. Our model puts the student's needs, preferences, and requirements at the center—and when those change, the engine solves the math and finds a new feasible path. No trial and error. No drag and drop. The student describes their life; we find the schedules that fit it.

26%

Students want better maps and planning tools—now.

One in four students say their institution could best promote their academic success by creating or clarifying program maps, pathways, and guided pathways—including 25% of fourth-year students still asking for this near graduation. Separately, 28% want institutions to introduce or enhance online platforms to help them plan and track degree progress.

Inside Higher Ed & College Pulse, Student Voice survey, July 2024

What the research says planning must do

EAB found that effective academic planning platforms must be adaptable over time as students' goals, needs, availability, and circumstances shift—and must help students understand requirements while accounting for personal interests and constraints. No current tool delivers both. PlanMyClasses was built to.

EAB, “Why academic plans can keep students on track”

Beyond planning

Not just a planner. A simulation engine for real what-ifs.

It explores the space of schedules that satisfy catalog rules and the student's requirements. Each answer arrives as a verified plan—the artifact that proves what's still possible (or why it isn't).

What happens if CHEM 201 isn’t offered next spring?

The engine recomputes the full remaining path, rerouting around the gap and preserving your graduation target.

Can I switch from Biology to Chemistry and still graduate on time?

Simulate a major change instantly—see which credits transfer, what’s left, and the new earliest graduation term.

Keep me between 9 and 15 credits per term so I stay FAFSA-eligible without paying out of pocket.

Financial aid floors and ceilings become formal constraints. The engine plans around them—no manual credit counting.

Which courses would delay graduation if I fail them?

Stress-test the plan: the engine identifies fragile gateway courses and scores recoverability before you commit.

I can’t take classes this fall—what does my path look like?

Remove a term entirely. The engine rebuilds the entire remaining plan around the gap in seconds.

Avoid chemistry and physics in the same term—I can’t handle both.

Personal preferences become formal constraints, not suggestions. The engine guarantees the pairing never appears.

How it works

From catalog data to simulation engine.

PlanMyClasses is a headless API. Your platform stays in control—we turn policies and preferences into a computable model students can explore.

01

Connect your catalog data

Send us your program requirements, prerequisite chains, and term-level course offerings. We ingest structured catalog data via API or bulk import.

02

Students express constraints in plain language

"Avoid chemistry and physics together. Only 3 classes this fall because of an internship. Graduate by Spring 2030." Freeform text is parsed into formal, verifiable rules.

03

The engine solves the entire possibility space

Instead of validating one schedule, the engine searches every feasible course-to-term assignment across the full constraint model and returns a verified, recoverable pathway—not a template.

04

Simulate, stress-test, and iterate

A plan is the starting point. Students and advisors simulate what-if scenarios—failed course, dropped term, switched major, FAFSA credit caps—and get a new verified path in seconds. No trial and error. No drag and drop. Just answers.

See it in action

Watch the engine simulate a real degree plan.

See constraints added in plain language, the solver searching the possibility space, and what happens when requirements conflict—proving what is and isn't feasible. Scripted illustration, not live output.

Research & ROI

We're the missing piece in the advising gap.

When a grade posts, a prerequisite breaks, or a required course is not offered in the term a student expected, static maps stop working. That moment is a retention risk—not because students lack ambition, but because they cannot see a verified path forward.

A verified planning engine is the catalyst: it recomputes a verified course-to-term plan immediately, keeps students on a credible path, and reduces reactive “plan rescue” work so advisors can focus on careers, life, and holistic support—not spreadsheet-style schedule crunching.

Crisis

Pathway paralysis after a shock

Gateway failure, shutouts, and term-level offering gaps silently push students off track. Without a replan, many disengage—institutions lose persistence they could have protected with a verified alternative path.

Catalyst

Immediate verified replan

The engine searches the remaining degree requirements against catalog rules and offerings, producing a verified plan students can act on—raising the odds they stay enrolled and on degree.

Advising capacity

Less plan crunching, more life-and-career advising

When feasibility is grounded in the catalog 24/7, students register with fewer mistakes and fewer emergency appointments. Advisors reclaim time for judgment-heavy conversations—internships, wellbeing, transfer, and major fit—instead of rebuilding schedules by hand.

Every statistic below is tied to a public source. Each one is a gap that verified planning directly addresses.

15–46%

Gateway courses have staggering DFW rates

Nationally, DFW (D/F/Withdraw) rates in gateway courses range from 15% to 46% depending on the discipline. 85% of course retakes are concentrated in just 5% of all courses offered.

How PlanMyClasses addresses this

PlanMyClasses front-loads high-risk gateway courses into the earliest feasible term and scores every plan for recoverability — so if a student fails CHEM 121, there is a built-in re-take window that does not push graduation out.

EAB, Course Completion Rates White Paper; Every Learner Everywhere, DFWI Rate Equity Brief, 2018

~15%

Required courses line up with student timing only a fraction of the time

Reporting on Ad Astra scheduling data found that colleges provide required courses when students actually need to take them only about 15% of the time—a structural scheduling gap that drags out time-to-degree and raises costs when plans cannot be recomputed against reality.

How PlanMyClasses addresses this

PlanMyClasses reasons over prerequisites and term-level offerings so students see verified, term-by-term paths—not a static map that breaks the moment a section fills or a course moves. When the catalog shifts, the engine recomputes what is still feasible.

The Hechinger Report, "Being shut out of required courses is delaying college students' graduation" (Ad Astra scheduling analysis)

+27.77 pp

Formal academic plans are tied to much stronger next-term registration

EAB analyzed credit and registration data from 12 partner institutions: students who completed a formal academic plan registered for the next semester at a 27.77 percentage-point higher rate than peers without a plan, preserving an average of $281,000 in tuition and fee revenue per institution. National Student Voice data confirms broad demand for better planning tools—and institutions that provide them see measurable retention gains.

How PlanMyClasses addresses this

EAB stresses that effective academic planning must stay adaptable as students' goals, needs, availability, and circumstances shift—while still grounding advice in real requirements. PlanMyClasses encodes catalog policy and personal constraints in one feasibility model so every update stays verifiable, not aspirational.

EAB, "Why academic plans can keep students on track" (12-institution analysis); Inside Higher Ed & College Pulse, "Students want more clarity around academic pathways," July 2024

Only 20%

One in five students are required to meet with an advisor

Only 20% of students report being required to meet periodically with an academic advisor. Just 55% have ever received guidance on required courses and sequences for graduation.

How PlanMyClasses addresses this

PlanMyClasses powers always-on, self-service planning inside the platforms students already use — delivering verified, catalog-accurate plans so advisors spend less time on manual plan repair and more on careers, life circumstances, and high-judgment mentoring.

Inside Higher Ed & College Pulse, Student Voice survey on advising and registration, 2023

~33%

Roughly one in three students hit registration walls on courses they need to graduate

In a national Student Voice survey of undergraduates, about one-third said a course they needed to graduate had filled before they could register—and the same share said a needed course was not offered in the term they had planned to take it. Separately, about one in 10 reported being advised to take a course that was not actually available to them because they were missing a prerequisite.

How PlanMyClasses addresses this

The engine reasons over the full prerequisite graph and term-level offerings before anyone registers: it surfaces infeasible sequences early and, when a course is not available in a term, searches for an alternative feasible path instead of letting the timeline drift.

Inside Higher Ed & College Pulse, Student Voice survey on advising and registration, 2023

3–15%

Proactive advising platforms lift graduation rates

Institutions using proactive advising technology report 3–15% improvements in graduation rates and 2–12% improvements in retention. Virginia Commonwealth University saw an 8% increase in four-year graduation using predictive analytics and proactive campaigns.

How PlanMyClasses addresses this

PlanMyClasses provides the verified planning layer these platforms lack. While predictive analytics identifies at-risk students, PlanMyClasses solves for what to do about it — producing a verified, recoverable path, not just an alert.

EAB Navigate360 Case Study Compendium, 2024; VCU Case Study

Sources

  1. EAB, "Course Completion Rates" White Paper
    https://pages.eab.com/rs/732-GKV-655/images/APS-CourseCompletionRates-WP.pdf
  2. Every Learner Everywhere, "Equity and the DFWI Rate," 2018
    https://www.everylearnereverywhere.org/blog/equity-and-dfwi-rate-or-dfw-rate
  3. The Hechinger Report — "Being shut out of required courses is delaying college students' graduation"
    https://hechingerreport.org/students-cant-get-into-basic-college-courses-dragging-out-their-time-in-school/
  4. EAB — "Why academic plans can keep students on track"
    https://eab.com/resources/blog/student-success-blog/help-students-build-academic-plan/
  5. Inside Higher Ed & College Pulse — "Survey: Students want more clarity around academic pathways," 2024
    https://www.insidehighered.com/news/student-success/academic-life/2024/07/26/survey-students-want-more-clarity-around-academic
  6. Inside Higher Ed & College Pulse, Student Voice survey — "Student survey reveals gaps in core academic advising functions," 2023
    https://www.insidehighered.com/news/student-success/academic-life/2023/02/28/student-survey-reveals-gaps-core-academic-advising
  7. EAB Navigate360 Case Study Compendium, 2024
    https://www.wisconsin.edu/ss-eab-project/download/2024-Navigate-Case-Study-Compendium-4yr.pdf
  8. Aspen Institute, "Gateway Course Completion Rates in the First Academic Year"
    https://highered.aspeninstitute.org/measures-student-successs/gateway-course-completion-rates-first-academic-year

Built for your stack

What this adds for platform owners.

Whether you run a student information system, a planning layer, or an AI advising product—PlanMyClasses fills the gap between data and action.

SIS leaders

A planning surface that stays consistent with catalog rules, prerequisites, and term offerings.

PlanMyClasses simulates pathways across the full catalog model—not just validates a template. The output is a verified course-to-term plan that recomputes when catalog data, offerings, or student records change.

Planning-layer leaders

A system that can store user intent, not just course history.

Students don’t drag and drop. They describe what they need, and the simulation engine finds every valid path. Preferences become formal constraints—credit caps, term exclusions, conditional pairing rules—solved automatically.

AI / platform leaders

A verified substrate under copilots and natural-language planning.

Freeform requests are parsed into constraint objects, validated against policy, and solved by a proprietary feasibility computation engine. The model can explain, but it is not doing the solving.

Integrations

Drops into the stack you already run.

One API endpoint. JSON in, verified plan out. Our engine integrates with any student information system—no UI adoption required.

Workday StudentEllucianStellicPeopleSoftBannerAnthology

Product names are trademarks of their respective owners and are used for compatibility reference only.

Partnership

Let's build the planning layer together.

We partner with SIS vendors, student-success platforms, and AI foundation model teams. Tell us about your integration use case.

For how verified planning supports retention paths and advising capacity, see Institutional impact.